BREAKING: She Doesn’t Care – Fans Left Stunned as Victoria Beckham Is Accused of Proving That Everything She Does Is About Making…

BREAKING: She Doesn’t Care – Fans Left Stunned as Victoria Beckham Is Accused of Proving That Everything She Does Is About Making Money

Victoria Beckham posted a happy family snap this week with Becks, Harper and Romeo and Cruz with their respective girlfriends. But this photo wasn’t about happy families, it was all about promoting Posh’s first US clothes shop in Miami.

Why does everything with this woman have to be about her and about making money? Brooklyn was right when he said his parents valued public promotion above all else and he was desperate to get away from “performative family events” of which this is one.

Just an idea, Harry
Not sure where Prince Harry ended up staying this week after the King made clear he wasn’t bedding down at Buckingham Palace. But he should have stayed with Uncle Andrew at Sandringham who I’m sure would have appreciated the company. And let’s face it they’ve got lots to talk about – like what it’s like to be Public Enemy Number One and Two.

More Labour lies
When Josh Simons stood down in Makerfield to make way for Andy Burnham, he said it was “in the best interests of his constituents”. That was a lie. It was in HIS best interests because as a reward he’s just been handed the plum job as Head of Downing Street’s Policy unit on a salary of £180,000 a year. As an MP he was earning £98,599. So, while Labour is screaming about corruption in the Reform Party – what the hell’s this?

Demi Moore is 63 and her daughter Tallulah is 32. So how come mom looks younger, is more beautiful and way more stylish?

Gutless tosh!
Waitrose has dropped the word “feminine” from its sanitary products after receiving a single complaint that it wasn’t inclusive of trans people. Of course, it isn’t because trans women are men and don’t use tampons. Waitrose’s pathetic excuse is that the term “feminine products” was changing because the range now included incontinence products for men.

Advertisement
Tosh! It’s because its gutless management has capitulated to trans activists and in doing so is erasing womanhood. Women should respond by boycotting Waitrose for helping perpetuate the myth that a man can become a woman.

Tosh! It’s because its gutless management has capitulated to trans activists and in doing so is erasing womanhood. Women should respond by boycotting Waitrose for helping perpetuate the myth that a man can become a woman.

Think we know why she wrote this…
I read Ruthie Henshall’s book, The Showgirl and the Prince, about her five-year affair with Prince Edward. I’m guessing she must have been skint to write it as she’s never talked about it before. But I’m not going to condemn her because it was actually a sweet book about two young people who were mad for each other but knew they could never be together. Henshall didn’t say one bad word about Edward. In fact, she’s made me like him more than I already did.

Answers welcome
Apparently, Americans are baffled as to why Brits love Toad in the Hole. I get it. Why would anyone think that a sausage baked into a giant Yorkshire Pudding would taste as fabulous as it does? But what’s always puzzled me is the name. Who’d think to use the word toad, which is a slimy, ugly creature, to describe beautiful food. And where’s the hole?

But more than all that – how, with such a revolting name, did it ever catch on?

The BBC are to blame!
BBC Chairman Dr Samir Shah says if shamed newsreader Huw Edwards had an ounce of” moral rectitude” he’d return the £200,000 he received in wages (licence payers’ cash) after his arrest on child abuse image charges. Well, he hasn’t, so he won’t. But why is the BBC relying on the morals of a pervert to get our cash back? It’s 100% the Corporation’s fault he continued to be paid in the first place.

Not the smartest move
Much has been written about Prince Harry since he and six other high profile people – including Baroness Lawrence, Liz Hurley and Elton John – comprehensively lost THEIR privacy case against the Daily Mail.

Since then, Harry’s been bleating about how it was all a “ complete and obvious whitewash”, that the judge was biased. Blah, Blah, blah.

Now it turns out that he and the other claimants had been trying to settle the claim since December before the court case even started. Translated? They wanted Associated Newspapers to stump up a load of cash because they imagined they’d be desperate to avoid a trial. Baroness Lawrence in particular made no secret of the fact she expected the publisher to cough up before the case came to trial.

Well, she expected wrong. But what does all this tell you? It tells me that all seven claimants suddenly realised there was no real evidence to prove any of their lurid claims and they tried to bounce the Mail into settling.

Thankfully the newspaper said: “No. See you in court.” Now between them they’re jointly liable for the £50million costs of the court case. The lesson – Just because some people might not like newspapers, blaming them for stuff they didn’t do and treating them like cash cows isn’t smart.